Marine Insight

Established in2010
Located inMumbai, India
News CoveragePORT AND SHIP

Advertise your business here! 🚀

Contact us now and get more customers.

Smiling woman thumbs up

10

MI Publishers' Articles

Filter by

View by
Ukraine Arrests Russian Ship Smuggling 5,000 Tons Of Stolen Grain From Crimea
Marine Insight
Ukraine Arrests Russian Ship Smuggling 5,000 Tons Of Stolen Grain From CrimeaUkrainian authorities have seized a foreign cargo vessel accused of transporting stolen grain from Crimea, in a joint operation carried out by Ukraine’s Security Service (SBU) and the State Border Guard Service (SBGS). The ship was intercepted in the internal waters of the Black Sea, Ukraine announced. Investigators confirmed that the ship had loaded around 5,000 tons of wheat from the port of Sevastopol at the end of 2024. Sevastopol is located in Crimea, which Ukraine continues to regard as a temporarily occupied part of its southern territory. To hide the grain’s true origin, the vessel operated under the flag of one of the Asian countries-a tactic authorities say is commonly used by Russia’s “shadow fleet”. During the search operation, Ukrainian forces found documents, navigational equipment, and other physical evidence linking the ship and its crew to the illegal transportation of Ukrainian agricultural products. The vessel was immediately arrested, and its crew was detained for further legal procedures. A pre-trial investigation into the incident is ongoing. The SBU stated that the seized ship was involved in helping Russian forces loot and sell Ukrainian grain to third countries. The operation was conducted by officers from the SBU units in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and Odessa region, working together with the maritime protection units of the State Border Guard Service and the Naval Forces of Ukraine, under the procedural guidance of the Prosecutor’s Office of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol. Ukrainian officials have accused Russia of consistently stealing Ukrainian agricultural products since it occupied Crimea in 2014. According to open media reports like Bellingcat and Lloyd’s List, Russia has been moving grain out of Crimea for years. Ukrainian authorities have warned countries against buying stolen grain. Earlier in 2024, Ukraine had detained another vessel on the Danube River, which had transported grain from Crimea both in 2023 and again in 2024. After a court case, that ship was handed over to be Ukrainian state, and the captain along with an officer were arrested for prosecution. Ukraine’s latest action comes as political tensions grow over the status of Crimea. President Volodymyr Zelensky has reiterated that under Ukraine’s constitution, Crimea remains part of Ukraine and cannot be surrendered. He has previously called Crimea a “red line” in any negotiations to end the war with Russia. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump said in an interview published by Time Magazine on April 25 that “Crimea will stay with Russia,” and suggested that Zelensky “understands that.” Trump has criticised Ukraine, blaming it for prolonging the conflict and hindering peace talks, which he said he is keen to conclude. Ukraine’s announcement about the seized vessel came just before a planned meeting between US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and Russian President Vladimir Putin to discuss efforts to move the peace negotiations forward. At the same time, Ukraine’s National Resistance Centre recently reported that Russia is building a large agricultural market in occupied Mariupol, which officials believe is intended to support the export of stolen Ukrainian goods. Ukraine has also found evidence that grain taken from occupied territories is being shipped to countries such as Iran. The Ukrainian authorities stated that they will continue operations to stop the illegal export of Ukrainian resources from occupied territories. References: newsukraine, pravda Disclaimer : The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. While we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk. In no event will we be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from loss of data or profits arising out of, or in connection with, the use of this website. Disclaimer : The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. While we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk. Do you have info to share with us ? Suggest a correction
port-and-ship
Apr 26, 2025
Maryland Approves $160M Plan To Protect Bay Bridge From Ship Collisions
Marine Insight
Maryland Approves $160M Plan To Protect Bay Bridge From Ship CollisionsMaryland’s Transportation Authority (MDTA) has completed a safety study for the Chesapeake Bay Bridge and announced plans to improve the bridge’s defenses against potential ship collisions. The decision comes after heavy criticism from federal officials after the fatal collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore in March 2024. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has previously expressed concern over MDTA’s failure to assess the Bay Bridge for ship-strike risks, especially since it had already identified the structure as vulnerable. The collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge, when a container ship struck one of the bridge’s columns and killed six construction workers, and caused billions in damage, brought increased scrutiny to older US bridges over navigable waterways. According to the NTSB, the Key Bridge collapse could have been avoided if a proper risk analysis and pier protection were in place. After the incident, the board requested 30 bridge-owning agencies across the country to assess 68 aging and at-risk bridge spans. MDTA, which owns both the Key Bridge and the Bay Bridge, was specifically named for not having completed the Bay Bridge assessment at the time. MDTA says the risk analysis for the Chesapeake Bay Bridge has been completed. The agency spent $600,000 on the study, which was carried out by engineering firm Moffatt & Nichol, a recognised expert in ship-strike analysis. Their findings showed that the twin spans, built in the 1950s and 1970s, do not meet current safety standards set for modern bridges. While the bridge still complies with federal requirements for legacy structures, MDTA acknowledged that it does not meet current guidelines for vessel collision protection recommended by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). The agency stated that federal law does not require modifications for bridges that already have valid permits, but said it is voluntarily choosing to improve safety. The planned upgrades include adding stronger pier fenders and constructing large protective structures called dolphins, rock and concrete islands designed to shield bridge piers from runaway ships. The total estimated cost for this fortification project is around $160 million. MDTA also shared a list of short-term safety measures being considered. These include changes in communication protocols for vessel pilots, reducing ship speeds near the bridge, managing vehicle traffic more strategically, and possibly introducing one-way transits for ships. However, tugboat escorts are not currently part of the plan. Although MDTA had previously shared early plans for pier protection, the agency’s recent letter to the NTSB formally confirms its commitment. The NTSB’s recent review found that many bridges across the US were built long before ship-strike threats were fully understood. The Key Bridge, for example, was found to be 30 times more likely to suffer a ship strike than what is acceptable under modern standards. A separate analysis by Johns Hopkins University suggested the Bay Bridge could be hit once every 86 years, compared to once every 48 years for the now-collapsed Key Bridge. Although the ship has never been hit by a large vessel but a ship near-miss due to a steering issue last year led to a rare temporary closure of the span. In response to the NTSB’s criticism, MDTA officials said they are developing a full risk-reduction strategy and expect to begin designing the fortifications by summer. While a final timeline has not been confirmed, earlier estimates suggested that the work could be completed between winter 2027 and 2028. As the twin spans of the Bay Bridge approach the end of their expected lifespan, MDTA’s chief engineer mentioned earlier this year that the new protective infrastructure could eventually be incorporated into a future replacement bridge. Despite NTSB Chair Jennifer Homendy’s public warning in March urging people to think twice about crossing the Bay Bridge, MDTA’s executive director later reassured the public that the bridge remains safe for travel. Reference: thebaltimorebanner Disclaimer : The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. While we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk. In no event will we be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from loss of data or profits arising out of, or in connection with, the use of this website. Disclaimer : The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. While we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk. Do you have info to share with us ? Suggest a correction
port-and-ship
Apr 22, 2025
North Korea Ships 16,000 Containers Of Munitions To Russia For War With Ukraine
Marine Insight
North Korea Ships 16,000 Containers Of Munitions To Russia For War With UkraineA recent investigation by Reuters and the UK-based Open Source Centre (OSC) has revealed that Russian artillery forces have become heavily dependent on North Korean ammunition. According to Russian military documents and open-source research, nearly all artillery munitions used by Russia in the ongoing conflict are now supplied by North Korea. Between September 2023 and March 2025, four Russian-flagged vessels, namely, Angara, Maria, Maia-1, and Lady R, made a total of 64 trips between North Korea and Russian ports. These ships carried around 16,000 containers from the North Korean port of Rajin to Russia’s Vostochny and Dunai ports. The containers are estimated to include between 4 to 6 million artillery shells, which were later transported by rail to ammunition storage sites near the front lines in Ukraine. This massive supply from North Korea contrasts sharply with Russia’s domestic production of artillery shells. In 2024, Russia is believed to have produced only about 2.3 million shells, according to Ukrainian and Western officials. Despite the evidence, the Kremlin denied any arms trade with North Korea in October 2023, stating there was no proof of such activities. However, Reuters reviewed at least six Russian artillery unit reports showing that some units relied on North Korean munitions for up to 100% of their shelling operations in Ukraine. Three other reports did not mention North Korean shells. Defense expert Konrad Muzyka from the Poland-based Rochan Consulting noted that North Korean supplies played a key role in allowing Russia to maintain its operational pace on the battlefield since late 2023. Ukraine’s Defense Intelligence Agency (GUR) also confirmed the importance of these supplies, stating that Russian artillery firepower would have been reduced by half without support from North Korea. Hugh Griffiths, the former coordinator of the UN panel overseeing sanctions on North Korea, added that President Vladimir Putin would struggle to continue the war without Chairman Kim Jong Un’s military backing. The OSC and Reuters confirmed the North Korean arms shipments through a combination of satellite imagery, verified social media footage, intercepted Russian military reports, and input from three senior Ukrainian government and military officials. North Korea has also delivered ballistic missiles, long-range artillery, and multiple-launch rocket systems to Russia. This represents the most substantial direct military support Russia has received for its war efforts, alongside Iran’s drone technology and China’s economic assistance. The weapons partnership between Moscow and Pyongyang first gained attention in 2023 but became more critical recently when North Korean military personnel, equipment, and ammunition were sent to help Russian troops push back Ukrainian forces from the Kursk region. By January 2025, approximately 4,000 North Korean soldiers had been killed or injured in fighting in Kursk, according to a South Korean security source. North Korea later sent an additional 3,000 troops in February. Ukrainian military intelligence chief Kyrylo Budanov reported that since late 2024, North Korea has supplied Russia with 120 self-propelled long-range artillery systems and 120 multiple-launch rocket systems. Some of this equipment was recorded by Ukrainian drones operating in Kursk. Although Western nations, including a Czech initiative to deliver 1.6 million shells, have supported Ukraine militarily since Russia’s full-scale invasion in February 2022, that aid has been inconsistent and increasingly uncertain. No Western country has sent soldiers to fight in Ukraine. North Korea’s delegation at the United Nations in New York and Geneva, its embassy in London, Russia’s Ministry of Defense, and South Korea’s Ministry of National Defense and National Intelligence Service did not respond to Reuters’ requests for comments on these findings. Reference: Reuters Disclaimer : The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. While we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk. In no event will we be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from loss of data or profits arising out of, or in connection with, the use of this website. Disclaimer : The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. While we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk. Do you have info to share with us ? Suggest a correction
port-and-ship
Apr 17, 2025
World’S Largest Liquid Carbon Dioxide Carrier Launched At Ulsan Shipyard
Marine Insight
World’S Largest Liquid Carbon Dioxide Carrier Launched At Ulsan ShipyardHD Hyundai Mipo, a subsidiary of HD Hyundai Shipbuilding, has launched the world’s largest liquefied carbon dioxide (LCO2) carrier at its Ulsan shipyard. The launching ceremony for the vessel, which can carry up to 22,000 cubic meters of LCO2, was recently held at the company’s headquarters. This vessel is the first of four LCO2 carriers ordered by Greece-based Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. The ship measures 159.9 meters in length, 27.4 meters in width, and 17.8 meters in height. Previously, commercial LCO2 carriers were limited to a 7,500 cubic meter capacity, making this new vessel the largest of its kind globally. The ship is designed with three Bi-lobe type storage tanks, capable of maintaining temperatures as low as -55°C. This allows it to safely carry a variety of liquefied gases including carbon dioxide, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and ammonia (NH₃). The ship has been fitted with several advanced features like a land based power supply system (Alternative Marine Power) and a selective catalytic reduction device to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions. It also features ice-resistant design technology (Ice Class 1C), enhancing its navigational stability in harsh conditions. The vessel will undergo final outfitting and sea trials before being delivered by the end of this year under the supervision of Capital Gas Ship Management Corp. According to UK-based Clarkson Research, achieving global carbon neutrality by 2050 will require capturing and storing over 6 gigatons of carbon annually. About 20% of this amount, roughly 2,500 LCO2 carriers, will need to be transported by sea. HD Hyundai aims to capitalise on this growing demand using domestic technology and innovation. An HD Hyundai representative said that they are actively working on eco-friendly technologies to remain competitive in the global shipbuilding and marine industry. HD Hyundai Mipo has also invested in research infrastructure. In April last year, along with other HD Hyundai Shipbuilding affiliates, the company established a ‘ship carbon neutral R&D demonstration facility’ at HD Hyundai Heavy Industries’ Ulsan base. The facility is being used to test the safety and efficiency of cargo systems and to develop new welding materials for storage tanks. Reference: HD Hyundai Mipo Disclaimer : The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. While we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk. In no event will we be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from loss of data or profits arising out of, or in connection with, the use of this website. Disclaimer : The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. While we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk. Do you have info to share with us ? Suggest a correction
port-and-ship
Apr 17, 2025
China Begins Testing First Marine Hydrogen-Ammonia-Methanol Project
Marine Insight
China Begins Testing First Marine Hydrogen-Ammonia-Methanol ProjectChina has begun testing its first integrated offshore project that produces hydrogen, ammonia, and methanol from renewable energy sources. The facility, located in Yantan, in east China’s Shandong Province, has officially entered the trial operation stage after completing construction on March 27, 2025. The project is jointly developed by CHN Energy Hydrogen Energy Technology Co, Ltd, CIMC Raffles, and Guoneng Hydrogen Innovation Technology (Beijing) Co, Ltd. It is China’s first full-scale demonstration project covering the entire process of hydrogen production, storage, transportation, and usage at sea. At the heart of the project is a massive semi-submersible platform standing over 50 meters tall and weighing over 20,000 tons. This floating unit is equipped with solar power systems and electrochemical energy storage devices, making it self-sufficient in energy. It hosts three hydrogen production units, which include systems for both direct seawater electrolysis and freshwater electrolysis. The platform also features a desalination module capable of producing 5 tons of freshwater each day to support hydrogen production. One of the main goals of the project is to solve the problem of hydrogen storage and transport. To do this, the hydrogen generated offshore is converted into ammonia and methanol. These can then be used as clean marine fuels or as essential raw materials for various industries. The project uses offshore renewable energy to produce green hydrogen without relying on the power grid. It then turns the hydrogen into ammonia and methanol, making it easier to store and move, while helping reduce emissions in shipping and industry. Construction of the facility began in September 2024 and the project passed the design compliance review by the China Classification Society (CCS) in January 2025. Reference: chnenergy Disclaimer : The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. While we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk. In no event will we be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from loss of data or profits arising out of, or in connection with, the use of this website. Disclaimer : The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. While we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk. Do you have info to share with us ? Suggest a correction
port-and-ship
Apr 17, 2025
First Ship-To-Ship Lng Bunkering Completed At Abu Dhabi’S Khalifa Port
Marine Insight
First Ship-To-Ship Lng Bunkering Completed At Abu Dhabi’S Khalifa PortAD Ports Group, the leading logistics and port operator in the UAE, has successfully carried out its first ship-to-ship (STS) liquefied natural gas (LNG) bunkering operation at the deep-water Khalifa Port. This makes Abu Dhabi a key hub for alternative marine fuels and sustainable shipping practices. The operation involved the LNG bunker vessel Green Zeebrugge, which supplied LNG to the container ship MSC Thais while it was berthed at Abu Dhabi Terminals. This STS bunkering took place as part of a similar operation, where both cargo handling and LNG transfer were carried out at the same time. The bunkering was facilitated by Monjasa, a global marine fuels provider. The successful bunkering shows AD Ports Group’s capability to manage complex port operations by integrating cleaner fuel solutions within its infrastructure. It also supports the global maritime sector’s shift toward low-emission fuel alternatives. CEO of Abu Dhabi Maritime and Chief Sustainability Officer at AD Ports Group, Captain Saif Al Mheiri, said the group and Monjasa are committed to maintaining the highest environmental and safety standards. He said that reliable access to a diverse fuel mix is essential for shipowners looking to meet their decarbonisation goals. Mheiri added the Group will keep promoting sustainable solutions to support global climate goals. LNG is increasingly being seen as a cleaner marine fuel option. It produces lower levels of greenhouse gases, sulphur oxides, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter compared to conventional marine fuels. AD Ports Group and Monjasa plan to extend LNG bunkering services to other commercial ports in Abu Dhabi, including services for cruise ships at Zayed Port. They will also offer a full range of marine fuels such as Marine Gas Oil (MGO), Very Low Sulfur Fuel Oil (VLSFO), and High-Sulfur Fuel Oil (HSFO). The recent STS LNG bunkering operation followed global standards and protocols set by leading maritime organisations, including the International Maritime Organisation (IMO), International Association of Ports and Harbours (IAPH), International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), and Society of International Gas Tanker and Terminal Operators (SIGTTO). Through this initiative, AD Ports Group is not only contributing to cleaner shipping operations but also supporting the UAE’s Net Zero 2050 Strategy. Reference: AD Ports Group Disclaimer : The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. While we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk. In no event will we be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from loss of data or profits arising out of, or in connection with, the use of this website. Disclaimer : The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. While we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk. Do you have info to share with us ? Suggest a correction
port-and-ship
Apr 17, 2025
Us Sanctions Chinese Refinery & Shadow Fleet For Buying Iranian Oil Worth Over $1B
Marine Insight
Us Sanctions Chinese Refinery & Shadow Fleet For Buying Iranian Oil Worth Over $1BThe United States has imposed fresh sanctions on a Chinese refinery and several companies and vessels for their involvement in purchasing and transporting Iranian crude oil, which Washington says helps fund Iran’s government and terrorist groups. On April 16, 2025, the US Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced that it has sanctioned Shandong Shengxing Chemical Co, Ltd, a China-based independent “teapot” refinery. The refinery, located in China’s Shandong Province, purchased over $1 billion worth of Iranian oil. According to OFAC, some of this oil was supplied through a front company connected to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Qods Force (IRGC-QF). The Treasury Department stated that between March 2020 and January 2023, Shandong Shengxing transferred more than $800 million to China Oil and Petroleum Company Ltd (COPC), an IRGC-QF front company. COPC was responsible for facilitating the sale of Iranian crude oil and laundered billions of dollars through the US financial system. US authorities have seized $108 million from these transactions. This marks OFAC’s second sanction against an independent Chinese refinery for Iranian oil trade and the sixth round of sanctions targeting Iranian oil sales since the issuance of National Security Presidential Memorandum 2 (NSPM-2) by President Trump on February 4, 2025. The new sanctions also target several vessels and companies forming part of Iran’s shadow fleet which uses deceptive shipping practices to deliver Iranian oil to buyers, primarily in China. The newly sanctioned vessels are listed below: Reston (IMO 9265744): In early 2025, the Cameroon-flagged vessel received over 1 million barrels of Iranian oil through ship-to-ship transfers with already-sanctioned tankers WEN YAO (IMO 9288095) and FIONA (IMO 9365752). BESTLA (IMO 9295593): A Panama-flagged vessel that received around 2 million barrels of Iranian oil via transfer from the sanctioned ATILA (IMO 9233753), previously known as HECATE. EGRET (IMO 9283801): Carried out a ship-to-ship transfer of Iranian crude with the sanctioned DUNE, a tanker operated by the National Iranian Tanker Company (NITC), near Indonesia in early 2025. NYANTARA (IMO 9242120): Received several hundred thousand barrels of oil from the SALVIA in early 2025. RANI (IMO 9250907): Transported Iranian oil from the sanctioned DERYA and delivered it to China. In total, these vessels are reported to have carried billions of dollars’ worth of Iranian petroleum. OFAC has also sanctioned multiple companies involved in managing and owning these tankers: All the above companies are designated for operating in the petroleum sector of the Iranian economy. The associated vessels have been identified as blocked properties in which these companies have an interest. Reference: US Department of State Disclaimer : The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. While we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk. In no event will we be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from loss of data or profits arising out of, or in connection with, the use of this website. Disclaimer : The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. While we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk. Do you have info to share with us ? Suggest a correction
port-and-ship
Apr 17, 2025
Moroccan Dockworkers Demand Boycott Of Maersk Ships Transporting Supplies To Israel
Marine Insight
Moroccan Dockworkers Demand Boycott Of Maersk Ships Transporting Supplies To IsraelA Moroccan dockworkers’ union has demanded a boycott of a Maersk ship suspected of transporting U.S. military parts to Israel. The call, backed by religious groups and pro-Palestine activists, has stirred up plans for protests at key Moroccan ports and increased pressure on the government over its ties with Israel. The Union of Port Workers, part of Morocco’s influential Moroccan Labour Union (UMT), has released a strong statement this week urging all port employees, managers, and operators to refuse any form of service to the Danish ship Nexoe Maersk. The vessel is reportedly scheduled to arrive at the Port of Casablanca on April 18, 2025. The union cited reports from activist organisations claiming that the Nexoe Maersk is due to receive a transshipped container from the Maersk Detroit, a U.S.-flagged vessel carrying spare parts for American-made F-35 fighter jets. According to these reports, the Maersk Detroit, an 84,626 deadweight tonnage (dwt) ship with a capacity of 6,200 TEU, is on its way to Tangier Med Port and is expected to transfer its cargo to the smaller Nexoe Maersk, which is a feeder vessel flagged in Hong Kong and capable of carrying 2,250 TEU. The container came from Houston and is said to be bound for Israel’s Nevatim Airbase, one of the Israeli Air Force’s key facilities involved in air operations over Gaza. Maersk has firmly denied the accusations, stating that the claims are false and not based on verified facts. A company spokesperson in Morocco told local media that the allegations were being spread by activist groups and are “misleading.” They added that when Maersk handles F-35 parts, they are meant for partner countries participating in the F-35 program, not for direct military use or shipment to conflict zones. The spokesperson further explained that Maersk adheres to strict policies which prohibit the transport of weapons or ammunition into war zones and that all military-related cargo undergoes thorough checks and must comply with international regulations. In this case, the company said that there was no confirmed military destination or use for the cargo involved. However, the Moroccan dockworkers’ union insists that facilitating the ship’s movement would be equivalent to supporting violence against Palestinians. In their statement, they called on national authorities to prevent the Nexoe Maersk from docking not just in Casablanca, but also in Tangier Med, where the container handoff is expected to take place. A group of Moroccan Islamic scholars and clerics, including members of the influential Al-Adl Wal Ihssan movement, issued a rare religious ruling declaring any support or facilitation of the ship’s arrival as forbidden. They argued that allowing military shipments to Israel amounts to a betrayal of the Muslim community and cited religious texts to reinforce their stance. Morocco’s Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement revealed that at least six Maersk ships docked at Moroccan ports between November and December 2024. While only one ship had Israel as its official destination, activists claim others were likely involved in transferring military cargo. The Maersk Detroit, operated by Maersk Line, Limited under the U.S. flag, is part of the U.S. Maritime Security Program (MSP). The MSP supports the transport of U.S. government cargo, including military equipment. Activists have previously protested against this vessel and others linked to similar missions, accusing them of helping carry out U.S. foreign policy under the guise of civilian shipping. A port source at Tangier Med told local outlet Hespress that authorities are unaware of the exact contents of containers passing through the terminal. The port is partially operated by Maersk itself. Dockworkers in Fos-sur-Mer, France, refused to handle the same Maersk ships last week, delaying their scheduled arrivals. France’s CGT union is also considering a full boycott of trade with Israel, following the International Court of Justice’s assessment that Israel’s actions in Gaza may amount to genocide. As of April 15, tracking data shows the Nexoe Maersk en route to Valencia, Spain, while the Maersk Detroit is heading toward Tangier, Morocco. In response, pro-Palestinian groups in Morocco have announced plans to stage protests at the Casablanca and Tangier ports on April 18 and 20, respectively. These would be the first large-scale port protests since the Gaza war began in late 2023. Cities like Rabat, Casablanca, and Tangier have seen massive protests demanding a complete end to diplomatic, military, and economic relations with Israel. While Moroccan lawmakers and ministers have spoken out against the war and called for a ceasefire, the government has remained silent on the specific allegations about arms shipments and the dockworkers’ call for a boycott. Maersk has not issued any new statements after the union’s latest announcement. Reference: newarab Disclaimer : The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. While we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk. In no event will we be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from loss of data or profits arising out of, or in connection with, the use of this website. Disclaimer : The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. While we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk. Do you have info to share with us ? Suggest a correction
port-and-ship
Apr 16, 2025
China Delivers World’S First Ultra-Large Container Ship To Cma Cgm
Marine Insight
China Delivers World’S First Ultra-Large Container Ship To Cma CgmChina State Shipbuilding Corporation Limited (CSSC) delivered a 24,000 TEU dual-fuel container ship, CMA CGM Seine, to the French shipping giant CMA CGM. The delivery took place in Shanghai. The CMA CGM Seine is the world’s first ultra-large container vessel powered by both liquefied natural gas (LNG) and conventional fuel. The dual-fuel system allows the ship to switch between LNG and oil as needed, contributing to more flexible and sustainable operations. The ship is massive in size-399 meters long and 61.3 meters wide, with a carrying capacity of 23,876 TEU containers, including space for 2,200 refrigerated containers. It can carry up to 220,000 tonnes of goods, and with an 18,600 cubic meter LNG fuel bunker, the ship is capable of sailing nearly 20,000 nautical miles without refuelling. This vessel is the first of four similar mega containerships ordered by CMA CGM. It is expected to begin service on the Far East to Europe shipping route starting April 18. This vessel is designed to reduce carbon dioxide emissions by about 20% and nitrogen oxide emissions by up to 85%, making it one of the cleanest ships in its category. A deputy general manager from Hudong-Zhonghua’s Changxing Shipbuilding facility shared that the ship’s construction timeline was major shortened. According to the official, the time from the beginning of construction to undocking was compressed to just 4 to 5 months, and the ship was delivered over six months ahead of schedule. So far, 17 container ships have been delivered by Hudong-Zhonghua to CMA CGM, of which 12 are dual-fuel vessels. The Changxing Island shipyard, where the vessel was built, is a major production hub for Hudong-Zhonghua and continues to grow its order book. Over 20 high-value vessels are currently under construction at the facility. The company’s confirmed schedule extends to 2029, with a total order value close to 140 billion yuan (approximately $19.6 billion). China Shipbuilding Group, officially known as China State Shipbuilding Corporation (CSSC), is one of the largest shipbuilding companies globally. It was formed in 1999 through the restructuring of China’s shipbuilding sector and is headquartered in Beijing. The group specialises in building a wide range of vessels, from commercial container ships and LNG carriers to naval ships and offshore equipment. Hudong-Zhonghua Shipbuilding, founded in 2001 after the merger of Hudong and Zhonghua shipyards, is CSSC’s major subsidiary based in Shanghai. References: china.org.cn, portnews Disclaimer : The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. While we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk. In no event will we be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from loss of data or profits arising out of, or in connection with, the use of this website. Disclaimer : The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. While we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk. Do you have info to share with us ? Suggest a correction
port-and-ship
Apr 16, 2025
Sweden Finds No Hard Proof Against Chinese Ship Intentionally Damaging Baltic Sea Cables
Marine Insight
Sweden Finds No Hard Proof Against Chinese Ship Intentionally Damaging Baltic Sea CablesA Swedish investigation has found no clear evidence to suggest that a Chinese-flagged ship intentionally damaged two subsea cables in the Baltic Sea last year. The Swedish Accident Investigation Authority (SHK) reported on April 15th, 2025, that the incident, which took place in November 2024, could not be definitively linked to intentional actions by the vessel. The Yi Peng 3, a bulk carrier owned by Ningbo Yipeng Shipping Co, was being investigated after it dragged its anchor across a large stretch of the Baltic Sea. Over the course of one and a half days, the ship’s anchor dragged for 180 nautical miles, damaging two vital subsea telecommunications cables. These cables were crucial for linking Finland to Germany and connecting Sweden to Lithuania. The SHK’s report states that, despite efforts to understand the incident, there is no certainty regarding whether the damage to the cables was deliberate. “It cannot be determined with certainty whether a Chinese ship intentionally damaged the data cables in the Baltic Sea,” the authority said in a statement. The SHK thought of two possible scenarios: one suggesting the ship deliberately dropped its anchor to damage the cables, while the other posits that the anchor became loose due to poor securing. However, the SHK pointed out that the deliberate damage theory seems unlikely because of the risks involved. Releasing the anchor at high speed could have endangered the ship and crew, which would be highly dangerous. On the other hand, the theory that the anchor was released due to faulty securing is also weakened by the fact that there was no major damage to the ship, and the anchor was on the seabed for a long period without causing much harm. The Chinese authorities maintained control over the vessel, which restricted Swedish investigators from conducting interviews with the crew or accessing important electronic data aboard the ship. As a result, Swedish authorities were unable to gather all the necessary information to draw a definitive conclusion. Swedish prosecutor Henrik Soderman confirmed that a separate investigation into the case is still ongoing. He stated that the Swedish prosecution is continuing to examine the case independently of the SHK’s findings. The damage to the cables occurred on November 17th and 18th, 2024. The Arelion telecommunications cable running from Gotland, Sweden, to Lithuania was severed on November 17th, and the C-Lion 1 cable, connecting Finland to Germany, was damaged the next day near Sweden’s Oland Island. Several nations, including Sweden, Finland, and Germany, launched probes into the incident, with Swedish police initially suspecting sabotage. This suspicion raised tensions in the Baltic Sea region, especially after Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022. Though the findings do not indicate deliberate damage, they do not prevent Swedish authorities from continuing their investigation. The Swedish Prosecution Authority can still pursue a preliminary investigation into criminal activity related to the incident. China has provided some documents and information about the Yi Peng 3 to assist with the investigation in December 2024. However, the country has denied any involvement in the severing of the cables, as has its ally, Russia, which has faced similar accusations related to infrastructure damage in the region. NATO has increased its presence in the region by deploying frigates, aircraft and naval drones to safeguard critical infrastructure. Reference: Reuters Disclaimer : The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. While we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk. In no event will we be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from loss of data or profits arising out of, or in connection with, the use of this website. Disclaimer : The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. While we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk. Do you have info to share with us ? Suggest a correction
port-and-ship
Apr 16, 2025